Folkloricity of Prose Narratives in Digital Age for Contextualized Reading Materials

  • Sherill A. Gilbas
  • Mary Jean N. Gamba
Keywords: Folkloricity, Prose Narratives, Digital Age, Contextualized Reading Materials, Philippines

Abstract

In this study, "folkloricity" refers to the transmission of tales or prose narratives from generation to generation. This paper employed a qualitative-descriptive approach to examine the underlying factors behind the familiarity or unfamiliarity of third generation Sorsogueno informants with their prose narratives in the digital age. It also demonstrated that the collected literary works, as well as their rank and category, were authentic Sorsogon folklore materials for possible contextualized instructional materials. The themes and messages of the tales could be preserved for future generations. The stories suggest that death can start life and a language barrier can provide a name. Folktales discuss love that can resurrect the dead and how regular people can outwit the powerful. Myths involve the supreme creator creating everything and punishing evil. Folksongs link humans and environment through rhythms, and life is a melody articulated in words. In conclusion, contemporary technology plays an important role in the propagation and preservation of this indigenous storytelling heritage. This article further suggests using prose narratives in contextualized courses, particularly in primary schools. Similarly, the faculty in the academe may collaborate with teachers to use the prose narratives to inculcate an appreciation for stories that may eventually turn into reading appreciation for better reading comprehension. An extension program in the community may be good avenue of postering cultural identity.

References

Banda, D., & Morgan, W. J. (2013). Folklore as an instrument of education among the Chewa people of Zambia. International Review of Education, 59(2), 197-216.
Bascom, W. (1965). The forms of folklore: Prose narratives. The Journal of American Folklore, 78(307), 3-20.
Bernabe, Bonifacio & Tangco. (2001). Social Science Information, A Special Issue on Folklore: UP Folklorist Series, 1.
Cabungcal, M. B., & Sabio, D. G. S. (2021). The portrait of Filipinas in selected Philippine folk songs. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(7), 2964-2972.
Contreras Suárez, A. L. (2016). Applying myths and legends in order to motivate students to enhance writing and reading at Jose Antonio Galan High School: action research.
Cook, M. P., & Pitre, L. A. (2021). Exploring relationships and connections to others: teaching universal themes through young adult novels. Rowman & Littlefield.
Eugenio, D. L. (1985). Philippine folktales: an introduction. Asian Folklore Studies, 155-177.
Gilbas, S. A. (2018). Structural and Motifemic Analysis of Legends. Green Publishing House. Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary (JIARM), 6(1), 56-64.
Goldstein, K. (1964). A Guide for Field Workers in Folklore. Hatboro: Folklore Associate.
Grantham, M. D. (2013). The Paradoxical Protagonist in Speculative Fiction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia).
Gray, J. P. (1978). Structural Analysis of Folktales: Techniques and Methodology. Asian Folklore Studies, 77-95.
Hidayat, H., Wasana, W., Pramono, P., Sabar, S., & Husodo, P. (2019, July). Living Folklore: Unlimited Creativity. In First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019.
Jalmasco1&2, M. A., & Asis-Gilbas, S. (2021) Sorsogon Legends in a Comic Book form: An Ginikanan. Appl. Res. J. Humanit, Soc, Sci, 4(2), 17-27
Kormelink, T. G., & Meijer, I. C. (2018). What clicks actually mean: Exploring digital news user practices. Journalism, 19(5), 668-683.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 7(1-4), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar
Ladd, G. W., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2019). Parents and children’s peer relationships. Handbook of parenting, 278-315.
Manuel, A. (1967). The Study of Philippine Folklore. In A. Manuel (Ed.), Brown Heritage. Quezon City, Ateneo De Manila University Press, Manila.
Pepicello, W. J., & Green, T. A. (1984). Language of riddles: new perspectives. The Ohio State University Press.
Realo, J., Salvador, A. J., Sonajo, G., Tagata, V. M., Vidad, N. A., & Cristobal, J. A. (2022). Improving the Grade 8 Students' Vocabulary Skill through Localized Game-Based Activities. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 1(2), 40-45.
Sugue, A. S., & Reyes, M. (2022). Rediscovering the Value of Philippine Mythology for Philippine Schools: Literature Review. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 4(3), 329-341.
Published
2023-12-08
How to Cite
Gilbas, S. A., & Gamba, M. J. N. (2023). Folkloricity of Prose Narratives in Digital Age for Contextualized Reading Materials . European Journal of Science, Innovation and Technology, 3(6), 37-47. Retrieved from https://ejsit-journal.com/index.php/ejsit/article/view/315
Section
Articles